The Van Thinh Phat Trial Phase 2: A Remediation Plan Lacking in Practicality

After a three-week trial regarding the case at the Joint Stock Company Van Thinh Phat Group and related units (phase 2), the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court is expected to deliver its verdict on the morning of October 17. In their final statements before the council retired to consider its verdict, most of the defendants expressed their remorse.

Belated Regret

Defendant Truong My Lan, former chairman of Van Thinh Phat Group, tearfully delivered her final words, pledging to prioritize compensating tens of thousands of people who had invested in the bonds. The representative of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Procuracy, who acted as the public prosecutor at the trial, stated that despite acknowledging several mitigating circumstances for defendant Lan, due to the seriousness of the case, the prosecution still proposed a life sentence for the defendant.

Previously, the representative of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Procuracy affirmed that after thoroughly analyzing and evaluating the trial proceedings, the prosecution maintained its indictment against the defendants. According to the prosecution, during the investigation and trial, the defendants confessed to the acts as stated in the indictment of the Supreme People’s Procuracy. The case was committed in an organized manner, with defendant Lan being the mastermind behind the issuance of the bonds, directing her accomplices to carry out the illegal cross-border currency transportation and money laundering.

The details of the case indicate that around August 2018, Saigon Commercial Joint Stock Bank (SCB) faced difficulties due to inspections by state management agencies and prolonged bad debt issues. Companies belonging to the Van Thinh Phat Group encountered challenges in obtaining credit. To address this, Truong My Lan organized a meeting with key leaders of SCB, the Van Thinh Phat Group, and TVSI Securities Company. They agreed to illegally issue private enterprise bonds to raise funds from the people to repay bank debts and invest in other projects.

Consequently, from 2018 to 2020, they used four companies belonging to the Van Thinh Phat Group (including An Dong, Quang Thuan, Sunny World, and Setra) to issue 25 fake bond codes without collateral, with a total value of more than VND 30,869 billion. The scheme involved creating fake cash flow to legalize primary investors from eight other companies within the group and then issuing private placement bonds to tens of thousands of people, raising funds for various purposes.

Many Defendants Cooperated Actively

Regarding civil liability, given defendant Lan’s highest role in the case, the representative of the prosecuting agency requested the council to order her to compensate a total amount of more than VND 30,000 billion.

The prosecution acknowledged defendant Lan’s desire to remedy the consequences of the case. However, they considered this proposal impractical and suggested a more concrete outcome to fully acknowledge her efforts.

To ensure defendant Lan’s compensation obligation, the prosecution recommended that the council uphold the voluntary remedy offered by other defendants in the case, confiscating more than VND 1,749 billion that they had voluntarily paid to offset Lan’s compensation liability. Additionally, the prosecution proposed confiscating assets and items related to the crimes of the defendants involved; returning assets to those unrelated to the crimes; confiscating, continuing to inventory, and freezing real estate, accounts, shares, and stocks of defendant Truong My Lan; and lifting the inventory and freezing measures on shares, accounts, and real estate of defendants who are not subject to compensation liability in the case.

Furthermore, the prosecution stated that the appendices listing assets accompanying the Ministry of Public Security’s Conclusion of Investigation No. 13, dated May 29, 2024, were determined to be civil relations. For the remaining civil relations, the representative of the prosecuting agency requested the council to resolve them according to the law, ensuring the defendants’ obligation to execute the judgment. The prosecution also suggested that the council consider using all the money and assets recovered from the case, along with the recovered amount in the first-instance judgment of phase 1, to remedy the harm caused to the victims.

The representative of the prosecution assessed that the defendants had committed the crimes in an organized manner, repeatedly, and with sophisticated tricks. These are aggravating factors in determining their criminal responsibility. However, considering the circumstances of the case, apart from defendant Lan, the other defendants played a role as accomplices. Therefore, the prosecution proposed considering their actions and differentiating their roles, nature, and extent of the crimes. Especially for those defendants who actively cooperated with the investigating authorities, the prosecution suggested additional mitigating circumstances.

Notably, defendant Chu Lap Co, Lan’s husband, was recognized for his active cooperation with the authorities during the investigation and trial, demonstrating a cooperative attitude and striving to remedy the consequences of the case. According to the prosecution, defendant Co has fully remedied the harm caused by his money laundering act, amounting to more than VND 33 billion.

The prosecution also mentioned that during the trial, the defendants Phan Chi Luan (former employee of Van Thinh Phat Group), Tran Thi Thuy Ai (former SCB treasury controller), and Truong Thi Kim Lai (former accountant of An Dong Company) took the initiative to compensate for the damage caused, ranging from VND 10 million to VND 20 million. Although these amounts are insignificant compared to the severe consequences of the case, considering the defendants’ difficult economic circumstances, the prosecution recognized their spirit of remedying the harm. As a result, it was proposed to reduce an additional one-year sentence from the previously suggested term for each defendant.