Who Will Be Affected by the New Rule Limiting Driving Hours?

The upcoming Road Traffic Safety and Order Act 2024 will bring about a significant change for professional drivers, as their driving hours will be limited. This new regulation aims to improve road safety and ensure drivers are well-rested, but it will undoubtedly present a challenge for those in the industry. With a restricted number of hours behind the wheel, drivers will need to adapt their routines and find new ways to optimize their time on the road. This change will require a shift in mindset and a reevaluation of how they approach their work, impacting their livelihoods and the logistics industry as a whole.

0
118

According to Article 64 of the 2024 Road Traffic and Transport Order and Safety Law, which will come into force on January 1, 2025, the working hours of commercial and internal transport drivers will be restricted.

Specifically, car drivers are not allowed to drive for more than 10 hours a day and no more than 48 hours a week. Continuous driving time should not exceed 4 hours, and the provisions of the 2019 Labor Code must be observed.

Commercial transport companies, internal transport units, and commercial transport drivers are responsible for complying with the regulations set out in Article 64 of the 2024 Road Traffic and Transport Order and Safety Law.

Illustration (Source: ATPN)

Currently, the working hours of drivers are stipulated in Article 65 of the 2008 Road Traffic Law (effective until December 31, 2024) as not exceeding 10 hours a day and 4 hours continuously.

From January 1, 2025, coach drivers will not be able to drive continuously for more than 4 hours. The total daily driving time should not exceed 10 hours and 48 hours per week. This regulation applies to both commercial and internal transport vehicles to ensure road safety and compliance with labor laws.

The new 2024 Road Traffic and Transport Order and Safety Law also stipulates the rights and obligations of drivers and attendants of commercial passenger vehicles in Article 59 as follows:

Drivers have the right to refuse to transport passengers if they engage in behaviors such as causing public disorder in the vehicle, obstructing the work of the driver or attendant, endangering the life, health, or property of others, or committing ticket fraud.

Drivers have the right to refuse to operate a vehicle if it does not meet the safety standards prescribed by law.

Drivers should not refuse to transport passengers, except in cases stipulated in Article 59, Clause 1. They must not cause difficulties for the elderly, people with disabilities, children, or pregnant women. Passengers’ consent is required before transferring them to another vehicle, unless in cases of force majeure.

Collect fares according to posted prices or transport contracts.

Be courteous and guide passengers to their correct seats, giving priority to the elderly, people with disabilities, children, and pregnant women.

Comply with the regulations on road traffic and transport order and safety and other relevant legal provisions.

You may also like

Attracting and Retaining Top Talent: Investing in Training for a Competitive Edge

The challenges faced by businesses in attracting and retaining talent have led many to invest in developing their own high-quality workforce through comprehensive training programs.

What Are the Circumstances Under Which an Employee Is Not Eligible for Sick Leave?

The new Social Insurance Law of 2024, which comes into effect on July 1st, 2025, outlines four specific scenarios in which employees who are social insurance participants will not be eligible to receive sickness benefits.

An Early Retirement Opportunity for Those With Extra Social Security Contributions

The Vietnam General Confederation of Labour (VGCL) has proposed an early retirement scheme for workers with excess years of social insurance contributions, suggesting that they should be able to retire early without facing pension deductions. This proposal was put forward during a workshop held to gather feedback and opinions on the social insurance law draft.