Unveiling the Van Thinh Phat Case: Massive Workload Makes 3-Month Appraisal ‘Impossible’

For cases under the direct supervision and guidance of the Central Steering Committee, such as the Vạn Thịnh Phát case, members of the National Assembly have proposed that the deadline for expert evaluations be determined by the Steering Committee itself.

0
13

During a discussion on the amended Forensic Expertise Law at the National Assembly’s professional session on October 1st, Delegate Lê Thị Song An (from Tây Ninh Province) raised critical insights.

Delegate Lê Thị Song An (Tây Ninh Province)

Addressing forensic expertise timelines, An urged drafters to include cases monitored by the Central Steering Committee on Anti-Corruption, Waste, and Negativity. She argued that the Committee should determine deadlines for complex, large-scale cases involving multiple entities.

Highlighting the Vạn Thịnh Phát case, she noted its immense scope: analyzing thousands of fraudulent loan files, tracing funds across a vast corporate network, and valuing assets to assess damages exceeding hundreds of trillions of dong. “A three-month deadline, as proposed, is unfeasible,” she stated.

Such constraints, she warned, could force rushed conclusions, compromising case integrity. An also opposed exempting experts from liability for professional opinions unless intentional misconduct occurs.

Instead, she proposed a professional accountability framework. Experts would be exempt if they prove impartiality, adherence to standards, and reliance on valid data. However, they’d face civil liability for negligence or incompetence causing harm and legal consequences for deliberate falsification.

“Broad exemptions create loopholes for underqualified individuals, risking biased outcomes,” she cautioned. She deemed the government’s rationale for liability waivers superficial and prone to abuse.

Justice Minister Nguyễn Hải Ninh responded that deadlines would be flexible: shortened for urgent cases, extended for complex ones.

You may also like

Supreme People’s Procuracy: Defendant Truong My Lan lacks sincerity

In the indictment, the Supreme People’s Procuracy proposes applying 9 mitigating circumstances to the criminal defendants.

What did Truong My Lan “reward” almost 1,500 billion VND for testifying in court?

As someone who was “rewarded” nearly VND 1.5 trillion by Ms. Truong My Lan for legal consulting work, the defendant Duong Tan Truoc admitted that he knew Ms. Lan had a reputable business and great potential in real estate, so he wanted to become a business partner.

“70 Inspection Proposals Rejected Before SCB Incident; No Special Monitoring Implemented”

During the monitoring process from 2016 to September 2022, the members of the Supervisory Team under the State Bank of Vietnam’s Ho Chi Minh City branch have produced over 70 report documents and proposals to leaders at all levels regarding the inspection and audit of SCB, placing SCB under comprehensive control and special scrutiny without obtaining higher-level approval.